← Back to the blog 🇲🇽 Mexico · Tax strategy · 7 min read

The most efficient tax formula for individuals: RESICO + a VAT-exempt or 0%-rated activity

Written for Mexico. This analysis applies to Mexican federal tax law — ISR (income tax), IVA (VAT) and SAT rules — and cites Mexican statutes. Amounts are in Mexican pesos (MXN).

Quick answerThe combination that legally minimizes the total burden: 1% to 2.5% income tax (RESICO for individuals) on an activity that charges no VAT — housing rental, agriculture, food. How it works, who qualifies, and where the limits are.

There's a combination in the Mexican tax system that produces total burdens that look like a typo — and it's perfectly legal because each piece is the express design of the legislature: RESICO for individuals (the simplified regime, 1% to 2.5% income tax on amounts collected) applied to an activity that charges no VAT (exempt or 0%-rated). The result: of every $100 you collect, the tax authority takes between $1 and $2.50 — and your customer pays not one peso of VAT on top. No offshore structure or aggressive position produces better numbers at this level of risk: practically zero.

The arithmetic of the formula

A typical taxpayer under the general regime bears income tax of up to 35% on profit plus the administration of 16% VAT. The one running the formula: 1–2.5% income tax on gross revenue, with no VAT to charge. Take the star case — the housing landlord: MXN 80,000 a month in rent from unfurnished apartments. Rental is included in RESICO for individuals, and rent of unfurnished residential housing is VAT-exempt. Total burden: ~$1,200 of income tax a month (1.5%). Zero VAT. No complex bookkeeping. Compare it against the same flow under the traditional rental regime (progressive rate after the blind deduction) or in a company (30% + a dividend layer): the formula wins by multiples.

Who can put it together

Does your activity — or part of it — fit the formula?

The diagnostic answers three questions with your numbers: whether your activity qualifies (or can be legitimately reorganized to qualify), how much you save against your current regime, and how your trajectory looks against the $3.5M cap — because the formula is so good that the temptation to force it is the only real risk. For housing-rental portfolios, this analysis is practically mandatory.

The fine print — because there always is some

Exempt is not 0%: in the exempt variants (housing, medical) the VAT on your expenses isn't recovered — for the landlord it barely stings (few VAT-bearing inputs that matter); in activities with a cost chain it does weigh; the 0% variants are economically superior because they credit and recover. The cap rules: $3.5M collected per year — the formula is for mid-sized personal and wealth flows, not for the large operation; going over gets you expelled, and landing without a plan is expensive. RESICO discipline: timely filings and obligations kept current — the regime forgives little. No deductions: if your activity has heavy expenses, run the comparison — the minimum rate on gross can lose to regimes with deductions when the margin is thin.

Labels: the formula with a genuine activity within the cap — safe: each component is an express statutory benefit, with no aggressive interpretation involved; audit risk is low and the defense trivial. Legitimately reorganizing the family's wealth so that housing rents are collected by the correct individual on RESICO — defensible with real, documented transfers (ownership must be true, not a nameplate). Splitting income among family members acting as fronts so each one "fits" under $3.5M, or dressing up rentals that aren't residential housing as if they were — red zone: classic simulation, visible in CFDI cross-checks, with recharacterization, 5-A, and the entire formula lost retroactively.

Frequently asked questions

Can I be on RESICO for my rentals and another regime for my other activity?

The general rule of RESICO for individuals is exclusivity with the traditional business regimes — within RESICO you can combine the activities that art. 113-E allows (business + professional + rental), but it can't coexist with the general activities regime on the side; wages and interest do coexist, with nuances. The architecture of who-collects-what within the family is where this restriction is resolved legally.

I rent 3 furnished, executive-style apartments — do I qualify?

RESICO yes (it's a rental), but the VAT exemption no: furnished loses it — you charge 16% and half the formula collapses. The furnish/don't-furnish decision is, among other things, a VAT decision: run the numbers on premium furnished rent against exempt rent before you buy the furniture.

What happens the year I go over $3.5 million?

You exit RESICO into whatever regime applies — and getting back in isn't easy. That's why the formula is run with projection: if your portfolio is going to grow, the transition plan (which assets migrate into a corporate structure, which flows stay with the individual) is designed a year ahead, not once the cap has already caught up with you.

Let's talk about your case

The first step is always the same: an honest diagnostic of where you stand. Write to us on WhatsApp or call — same business-day response.

← Back to the blog