← Back to the blog 🇲🇽 Mexico · Tax planning · 7 min read

In your name or the company's? The art. 93 & 151 guide to deciding where each asset lives

Written for Mexico. This analysis applies to Mexican federal tax law — ISR (income tax), IVA (VAT) and SAT rules — and cites Mexican statutes. Amounts are in Mexican pesos (MXN).

Quick answerThe technical criterion for deciding what you buy as an individual and what your company buys: art. 93 exemptions, art. 151 personal deductions, primary residence vs. commercial real estate.

"Do I put it in my name or the company's?" is probably the most repeated question in Mexican tax-and-wealth planning — and it has a methodical answer, not a gut-feel one: check whether the asset carries a tax benefit exclusive to individuals (arts. 93 and 151 of the LISR, the income tax law). If it does, it usually pays to hold it in your name; if it doesn't, the company almost always wins on deductibility and protection. The premise of the reel is correct; here it is with its numbers and its exceptions.

The individual's star asset: your primary residence

The sale of a primary residence is exempt from ISR up to 700,000 UDIS — around $6 million pesos at the current UDI (estimate; the UDI is updated daily) — provided you can prove it is your primary residence and you have not used the exemption in the three prior years (art. 93, section XIX, subsection a). Your company has nothing of the sort: if the house belongs to the company, every peso of gain pays 30%. The near-universal conclusion: the house where the family lives goes in the individuals' names — the ~$6M-per-event exemption, reusable every three years, is one of the biggest gifts in the system. (Protection bonus: that same house can also be set up as a patrimonio de familia (family patrimony, a homestead-style protection) — a topic for another article on the blog.)

The company's natural asset: productive real estate

The retail unit, the warehouse, the industrial building, the office: they have no sale exemption for the individual, and instead the company depreciates them (5% a year on the construction), deducts their maintenance, property tax and insurance, and credits the IVA (VAT) when the activity allows it. On top of that, holding them in a wealth-holding entity separate from the operating company — one that leases to the operating company at market value — adds the protection layer: the business risk does not reach the bricks. The individual wins only when the leasing regime with the 35% blind deduction beats the corporate structure — a comparison you run with numbers, not slogans.

Is your wealth distributed by design or by history?

The typical map of a business family mixes everything: the house inside the operating company, the warehouse in a personal name, the cars wherever they landed. Strategium reorders ownership asset by asset — with the art. 93 exemptions, the art. 151 deductions and the migration costs on the table — so that each asset lives where it yields the most, both fiscally and in terms of protection.

The quick decision checklist

The symmetric mistake to avoid: neither "everything in my name" (zero corporate deductibility, wealth exposed to your personal risks and the business's) nor "everything in the company" (you lose the art. 93 exemptions, and personal use of corporate assets creates its own deemed-income and non-deductibility problems). The right answer is an ownership portfolio — one you revisit every time you buy something big.

Frequently asked questions

Can I sell my current home to my company and claim the exemption?

The primary-residence exemption applies to the sale of your home, even to a related party — but the price must be at market (appraisal) and the transaction must have a business reason: the company buying the house where you will keep living for free opens up deemed income for use and challenges under art. 5-A of the CFF (the federal tax code). Technically viable; it earns a defensible label only with a subsequent market-rate lease and a real purpose.

Does the primary-residence exemption apply if the house is jointly owned with my wife?

Yes — better still: each co-owner applies their own exemption to their proportional share, which in practice can double the married couple's exempt ceiling. It is one of the technical reasons to decide ownership before buying, not after.

What about the second home (the vacation house)?

The exemption is for 'the' primary residence — provable with your tax domicile, receipts in your name, IDs. The vacation house does not have it: its sale is taxed with the art. 121 deductions. That is why the second home is indeed a candidate for structures (co-ownership, wealth-holding entity) depending on the exit plan.

Let's talk about your case

The first step is always the same: an honest diagnostic of where you stand. Write to us on WhatsApp or call — we reply the same business day.

← Back to the blog